Elise S. Brezis

Professor of Economics


Curriculum vitae



Head, Israel Macroeconomic Forum


Department of Economics

Bar-Ilan University, Israel



Population and economic growth: Ancient and modern


Journal article


Elise S. Brezis, Warren Young
The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 23(2), Taylor & Francis, 2016 Apr, pp. 246-271


View PDF
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Brezis, E. S., & Young, W. (2016). Population and economic growth: Ancient and modern. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 23(2), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2014.881897


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Brezis, Elise S., and Warren Young. “Population and Economic Growth: Ancient and Modern.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23, no. 2 (April 2016): 246–271.


MLA   Click to copy
Brezis, Elise S., and Warren Young. “Population and Economic Growth: Ancient and Modern.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, vol. 23, no. 2, Taylor & Francis, Apr. 2016, pp. 246–71, doi:10.1080/09672567.2014.881897.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{brezis2016a,
  title = {Population and economic growth: Ancient and modern},
  year = {2016},
  month = apr,
  issue = {2},
  journal = {The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought},
  pages = {246-271},
  publisher = {Taylor & Francis},
  volume = {23},
  doi = {10.1080/09672567.2014.881897},
  author = {Brezis, Elise S. and Young, Warren},
  month_numeric = {4}
}

Abstract

This paper focuses on the evolution of the relationship between population and economic growth from Hume to New Growth Theory. In this paper, we show that there were two main views on the subject. There were those who assumed that the relationship between fertility rate and income was positive. On the other hand, there were those who raised the possibility that this linkage did not occur, and they emphasized that an increase in income did not necessarily lead to having more children. Following from Hicks’ methodological precept, the paper will show that their position on the issue was related to a socio-economic fact: the sibship size effect. We show that those who took the view that an increase in income leads to the desire to have more children did not take into consideration the sibship size effect, while those maintaining that there existed a negative relationship introduced into their utility function a sibship size effect.

Keywords: population, economic growth, sibship size effect, children, fertility rates





Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in