Elise S. Brezis

Professor of Economics


Curriculum vitae



Head, Israel Macroeconomic Forum


Department of Economics

Bar-Ilan University, Israel



Why was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and a Carthaginian Peace?


Book Chapter


Elise S. Brezis
Keynes's Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years, chapter 9, Cambridge University Press, 2023 Dec, pp. 234-256


View PDF Publisher Book Page
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Brezis, E. S. (2023). Why was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and a Carthaginian Peace? In Keynes's Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years (pp. 234–256). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009407540.011


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Brezis, Elise S. “Why Was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and a Carthaginian Peace?” In Keynes's Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years, 234–256. Cambridge University Press, 2023.


MLA   Click to copy
Brezis, Elise S. “Why Was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and a Carthaginian Peace?” Keynes's Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years, Cambridge University Press, 2023, pp. 234–56, doi:10.1017/9781009407540.011.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@inbook{brezis2023a,
  title = {Why was Keynes Opposed to Reparations and a Carthaginian Peace?},
  year = {2023},
  month = dec,
  chapter = {9},
  pages = {234-256},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  doi = {10.1017/9781009407540.011},
  author = {Brezis, Elise S.},
  booktitle = {Keynes's Economic Consequences of the Peace after 100 Years},
  howpublished = {Online},
  month_numeric = {12}
}

Abstract

The Economic Consequences of the Peace was first published in 1919 and, since then, changed the economic discourse surrounding reparations and Carthaginian peace. This chapter specifies how three elements hinted at in the introduction of the Economic Consequences of the Peace – social classes, national sovereignty, and the international political system – can explain Keynes’ assessment of Carthaginian peace. The chapter analyses the optimality of reparations in the context of these three elements.

I show that in the situation of a hegemonic country, all classes – the working class as well as the elite – opt for no reparations. But, in a balance of power context, wherein no single actor on the international scene possesses hegemonic status, the working class will choose harsh reparations, while the transnational elite and Keynes will not.

Keywords balance of power, Carthaginian peace, hegemony, reparations, national sovereignty





Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in